I have previously accused the mainstream media of regurgitating the press releases of "vested interests" and now I am about to do the same. Here is a relevant one from the Australian Computer Society (ACS) from September last year.
-- Start of Press Release --
September 12, 2007 - 1:47PM
While Australia continues to have its lowest unemployment rate in decades, ICT professionals in their middle years aren't sharing in the rewards.
One in three ICT professionals in the 41- to 50-year-old age bracket have been unemployed in the past five years, at a time when the sector is experiencing an unemployment rate of 3.84 per cent, nearly half a per cent lower than the national average.
This is one of findings from the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Employment Survey for 2007, released today by the Australia Computer Society (ACS).
ACS president Philip Argy said the higher level of unemployment across the 41-50 age group was of concern.
"It is more likely that this unemployment is derived from a combination of age discrimination and either real or imagined concerns about the currency of their ICT skills."
The survey also revealed that 19.2 per cent of respondents felt that they had experienced discrimination on the basis of their age, and 9.6 per cent of respondents felt that they had been discriminated against on the basis of race and ethnicity.
"The survey results demonstrate that mature and experienced workers are being sidelined and their skill levels and corporate memory are being ignored. With the ICT industry suffering from major skills shortages, Australia is not in a position to ignore skilled professionals," Argy said.
Another disturbing finding in the survey is that 27.8 per cent of female respondents felt they had been discriminated against on the basis of gender, compared to 1.5 per cent of males.
It also found that sexual discrimination was significantly higher in Queensland and Western Australia.
-- End of Press Release --
The ICT industry in Australia, in particular has been decimated by the talking up of "skill shortages" and the bringing in of foreign workers under the 457 visa.
Clearly big business have discarded and ignored older workers because they have been able to easily import younger, cheaper and more compliant foreign substitutes.
And our Immigration Department and it's policy people have obviously been no intellectual match for the *spin meisters* employed by the large foreign owned ICT companies that have driven this agenda and which has been so damaging to Australian ICT workers.
So the message is rather stark.
If our Immigration Department has been "rolled" by the large ICT companies – why wouldn’t they have also been "rolled" by other large industries?
The truth is that they have been.
As I said previously – "Skill Shortages – its mostly BS".
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Skill Shortages – Part 2
It is difficult to find an impartial analyst – especially one who is both curious enough and thorough enough to uncover the facts and present the truth on the story of Australia’s "skill shortages" - and related government policy.
And the story of the 457 visa has been clouded by claim and counterclaim. To uncover the truth we need to dig deep to find and then discard the views of "vested interests" whose job it is to obfuscate.
For example, according to the Immigration Department, the latest (July 2008) figures show the average salary for a 457 visa-holder is around $73,000 and this is often compared with the average Australian salary of about $55,000 – all supposedly to demonstrate that these folks are being well paid – and so we should not be concerned.
The problem is that around 81% of the incoming workers are professionals – a significantly higher percentage than the Australian workforce generally. So you can see how this is an example of using selected statistics to skew the truth.
Journalists in the mainstream media in particular have been guilty of this – often just regurgitating the spin that is put about by "vested interests".
For a fairly complete and somewhat impartial commentary on the 457 visa there is a transcript of an interview between Peter Mares, Bob Kinnaird and Siew-Ean Khoo here.
As Bob Kinnaird says, "The key concerns about the IT area in 457s are that the visa grants in IT were actually increasing during a period of downturn in the graduate labour market in particular in Australia. Over the period 2001 to 2005 we had record levels of graduate unemployment amongst Australian graduates from computer science courses, yet the department was actually increasing the number of visa grants to young 457 visa holders and predominantly the growth was going to people from Indian companies and their salaries were being approved at very low rates".
The results of these "unintended consequences" are there for all to see in the shunning of computer science courses by young Australians in 2008. They observed what happened and have voted with their feet – often moving to legal and medical studies – which are seen as being "safer".
Meanwhile, the salaries of IT workers have plummeted and the bar has been moved ever lower. There does appear to be a key linkage between talking up "skill shortages" and driving down the salaries of Australian workers.
And we talk about being the "clever country".
And the story of the 457 visa has been clouded by claim and counterclaim. To uncover the truth we need to dig deep to find and then discard the views of "vested interests" whose job it is to obfuscate.
For example, according to the Immigration Department, the latest (July 2008) figures show the average salary for a 457 visa-holder is around $73,000 and this is often compared with the average Australian salary of about $55,000 – all supposedly to demonstrate that these folks are being well paid – and so we should not be concerned.
The problem is that around 81% of the incoming workers are professionals – a significantly higher percentage than the Australian workforce generally. So you can see how this is an example of using selected statistics to skew the truth.
Journalists in the mainstream media in particular have been guilty of this – often just regurgitating the spin that is put about by "vested interests".
For a fairly complete and somewhat impartial commentary on the 457 visa there is a transcript of an interview between Peter Mares, Bob Kinnaird and Siew-Ean Khoo here.
As Bob Kinnaird says, "The key concerns about the IT area in 457s are that the visa grants in IT were actually increasing during a period of downturn in the graduate labour market in particular in Australia. Over the period 2001 to 2005 we had record levels of graduate unemployment amongst Australian graduates from computer science courses, yet the department was actually increasing the number of visa grants to young 457 visa holders and predominantly the growth was going to people from Indian companies and their salaries were being approved at very low rates".
The results of these "unintended consequences" are there for all to see in the shunning of computer science courses by young Australians in 2008. They observed what happened and have voted with their feet – often moving to legal and medical studies – which are seen as being "safer".
Meanwhile, the salaries of IT workers have plummeted and the bar has been moved ever lower. There does appear to be a key linkage between talking up "skill shortages" and driving down the salaries of Australian workers.
And we talk about being the "clever country".
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
Skill Shortages - it's mostly BS
I keep hearing the nonsense that serious "skill shortages" exist in this country – most recently from someone who shall remain nameless - but who should know better.
Those people who are pushing the "skill shortages" barrow are really just vested interests who are trying to gain an advantage – usually at the expense of the rest of us.
So who are these vested interests?
Well mainly it is big business – often supported by small business – who have been *geed* up by the industry associations – which in turn have been setup by big business.
And often these vested interests have been aided and abetted by the recruitment industry – because these people live on the fees generated as labour moves around.
Big business has been driving the "skill shortages" agenda for a few years now – it’s all designed to drive down the cost of labour and to put pressure on government to allow the importation of foreign workers – often under the 457 visa.
The theory is that if business can control the importation of workers then they can more closely control who they bring in and at what cost. From the business perspective this is all about control over the supply and cost of foreign labour – which can then be used to set the benchmark for the cost of local labour.
There is also much greater opportunity to exploit vulnerable foreign workers as they often owe their employment, income prospects and immigration status to their business sponsor.
Who is looking after these workers?
The issue for me is that there has been no "expose" of what is going on – neither governments nor the media have done anything to raise awareness - why?
Those people who are pushing the "skill shortages" barrow are really just vested interests who are trying to gain an advantage – usually at the expense of the rest of us.
So who are these vested interests?
Well mainly it is big business – often supported by small business – who have been *geed* up by the industry associations – which in turn have been setup by big business.
And often these vested interests have been aided and abetted by the recruitment industry – because these people live on the fees generated as labour moves around.
Big business has been driving the "skill shortages" agenda for a few years now – it’s all designed to drive down the cost of labour and to put pressure on government to allow the importation of foreign workers – often under the 457 visa.
The theory is that if business can control the importation of workers then they can more closely control who they bring in and at what cost. From the business perspective this is all about control over the supply and cost of foreign labour – which can then be used to set the benchmark for the cost of local labour.
There is also much greater opportunity to exploit vulnerable foreign workers as they often owe their employment, income prospects and immigration status to their business sponsor.
Who is looking after these workers?
The issue for me is that there has been no "expose" of what is going on – neither governments nor the media have done anything to raise awareness - why?
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Unfinished Business – Indeed
Have just finished reading David Love’s new book "Unfinished Business" – which is about Paul Keating’s superannuation revolution that he started in concert with Bill Kelty and others - and which ended abruptly in 1996.
It’s a fantastic and true story, one that any thinking person will recognize as being a great overview of the key drivers of Australia’s economic performance over the past 15 or so years.
Keating’s revolution was based on his insight that by encouraging every citizen to save for retirement and with the help of government, a huge pool of investment capital would be created that could be used to enrich the nation.
This is the capital vat that has been used to great effect by Macquarie Bank and others to develop a world class financial services industry – mostly based in Sydney.
The book also shows how the Howard government wasted the opportunity to continue the superannuation ratio trajectory as Keating had planned - beyond 9% toward 12% and eventually to 15% of income and the risk now to the Australian economy as a result. All because of conservative party ideology.
This is weird because the conservatives seem to have a problem with a savings system that will provide for worker’s retirement but they seem to ignore the fact that the same system provides a mammoth investment pool for Australia’s benefit.
The book also shows that there is reluctance within the new Rudd government to pursue Keating’s "Unfinished Business" because of the people who are currently in control of superannuation policy. Is this a different ideology at work?
Love’s story provides a tremendous explanation of the creativity and innovation that happened in the Australian financial services industry – starting in the 1990’s. For me personally it is a great story because I was in the middle of it at the time. It also shows why other states are not as developed from a financial services perspective – because most of the action didn’t filter through to them. Like a lot of things at the time, most state government’s didn’t *get* what was happening and were left behind.
This is a fantastic book – and David Love has done a terrific job – it is something that should be compulsory reading for all thinking Australian’s on all sides of the political spectrum.
It’s a fantastic and true story, one that any thinking person will recognize as being a great overview of the key drivers of Australia’s economic performance over the past 15 or so years.
Keating’s revolution was based on his insight that by encouraging every citizen to save for retirement and with the help of government, a huge pool of investment capital would be created that could be used to enrich the nation.
This is the capital vat that has been used to great effect by Macquarie Bank and others to develop a world class financial services industry – mostly based in Sydney.
The book also shows how the Howard government wasted the opportunity to continue the superannuation ratio trajectory as Keating had planned - beyond 9% toward 12% and eventually to 15% of income and the risk now to the Australian economy as a result. All because of conservative party ideology.
This is weird because the conservatives seem to have a problem with a savings system that will provide for worker’s retirement but they seem to ignore the fact that the same system provides a mammoth investment pool for Australia’s benefit.
The book also shows that there is reluctance within the new Rudd government to pursue Keating’s "Unfinished Business" because of the people who are currently in control of superannuation policy. Is this a different ideology at work?
Love’s story provides a tremendous explanation of the creativity and innovation that happened in the Australian financial services industry – starting in the 1990’s. For me personally it is a great story because I was in the middle of it at the time. It also shows why other states are not as developed from a financial services perspective – because most of the action didn’t filter through to them. Like a lot of things at the time, most state government’s didn’t *get* what was happening and were left behind.
This is a fantastic book – and David Love has done a terrific job – it is something that should be compulsory reading for all thinking Australian’s on all sides of the political spectrum.
Monday, August 4, 2008
Superstition parading as science?
I sent a letter to "The Australian" this morning in response to another climate change denier and his fanciful story on page 8 - this has become a pattern at the OZ and frankly, I am over it.
-- Start of Letter --
You really do this nation a disservice by continuing your campaign of fear, uncertainty and doubt around climate change – as demonstrated by Arthur Herman’s article on Monday August 4th.
He starts off by quoting NASA as his source and then seriously misrepresents the data there. All your readers need to do is visit - this NASA page to see the true extent of the unfolding climate disaster. Australian’s don’t need this misrepresented through the filter of your bias.
The Australian and it’s editors might get their jollies by continuing to parade the world’s deniers as having credibility – but the poor and the ignorant will be the losers – is that your intent?
Most thinking Australians expect more from their national newspaper.
Its gone way beyond a joke – I only wish you would put as much effort into the rest of your newspaper as you do into the half truths and bias on the opinion pages which seem to have become someone’s personal vendetta against the nation.
You might consider adopting the motto of another large media organization – "Do no Evil" – because you will need to do something to resurrect your credibility.
-- End of Letter --
Of course The Australian won't print it - because their Editor, Chris Mitchell is running a campaign against anything to do with climate change - makes you wonder what he is scared of? Actually, the truth is that he is just another tired old right wing cultural warrior who thinks he is the only one able to take the fight to those dreaded lefties AND he has managed to con Rupert into thinking that he can do it. Makes me wonder why we tolerate their ignorance and stupidity - it's all so 1970's?
-- Start of Letter --
You really do this nation a disservice by continuing your campaign of fear, uncertainty and doubt around climate change – as demonstrated by Arthur Herman’s article on Monday August 4th.
He starts off by quoting NASA as his source and then seriously misrepresents the data there. All your readers need to do is visit - this NASA page to see the true extent of the unfolding climate disaster. Australian’s don’t need this misrepresented through the filter of your bias.
The Australian and it’s editors might get their jollies by continuing to parade the world’s deniers as having credibility – but the poor and the ignorant will be the losers – is that your intent?
Most thinking Australians expect more from their national newspaper.
Its gone way beyond a joke – I only wish you would put as much effort into the rest of your newspaper as you do into the half truths and bias on the opinion pages which seem to have become someone’s personal vendetta against the nation.
You might consider adopting the motto of another large media organization – "Do no Evil" – because you will need to do something to resurrect your credibility.
-- End of Letter --
Of course The Australian won't print it - because their Editor, Chris Mitchell is running a campaign against anything to do with climate change - makes you wonder what he is scared of? Actually, the truth is that he is just another tired old right wing cultural warrior who thinks he is the only one able to take the fight to those dreaded lefties AND he has managed to con Rupert into thinking that he can do it. Makes me wonder why we tolerate their ignorance and stupidity - it's all so 1970's?
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Money and Water – a volatile mix
I have been watching the recent SA Water billing issues and political response with great amusement – it’s all so very predictable.
Basically, the SA Parliament legislated last year to increase water charges – some by 13% from 1st July this year. But because the SA Water billing system is such a fossil, they couldn’t do it effectively on the day and so SA Water have been adding extra charges to bills generated from meter readings as they happen – some as early as last December.
All this means that the voters who have received those inflated bills are unhappy.
The state government has finally realised they will cop the blame and so they are proposing to refund *some* of the windfall. Or that is what Murdoch’s “daily shopper” reports – my guess is that it is a bit more complex.
The reason this has happened is that like so much of South Australia’s ageing infrastructure, no real investment in SA Water systems have been made for many decades and so the basic tools that we expect a water utility to have just don’t exist here. If they can’t get billing right then what about their people, assets, customer and demand management tools? My guess is that they are equally defective.
Actually, I know they are. It all reminds me of a time back in the “previous century” when I had responsibility for the billing systems of another state water authority – when the then leadership recognised the need to upgrade and move toward a more flexible system.
This was planned to be a system that could accommodate fast and unusual change and which was responsive to government, customer and business needs. It has been in place elsewhere since the mid 1990’s.
One of my early tasks was to travel the country, meeting with leaders from other water authorities – with the objective being to see if we couldn’t all get together and contribute to a system that would deal with uniquely Australian issues and more importantly be one that would satisfy the needs of our owners (the state governments), the various state water businesses and our customers.
Now I could write a book about the various responses to that. But the response of the then E&WS Department was - why?
Basically, the locals didn’t *get* the need for change – they were happy with what they had and couldn’t ever see a need for “flexible” billing – because well “we don’t do that sort of thing here”.
I am sure they don’t.
Basically, the SA Parliament legislated last year to increase water charges – some by 13% from 1st July this year. But because the SA Water billing system is such a fossil, they couldn’t do it effectively on the day and so SA Water have been adding extra charges to bills generated from meter readings as they happen – some as early as last December.
All this means that the voters who have received those inflated bills are unhappy.
The state government has finally realised they will cop the blame and so they are proposing to refund *some* of the windfall. Or that is what Murdoch’s “daily shopper” reports – my guess is that it is a bit more complex.
The reason this has happened is that like so much of South Australia’s ageing infrastructure, no real investment in SA Water systems have been made for many decades and so the basic tools that we expect a water utility to have just don’t exist here. If they can’t get billing right then what about their people, assets, customer and demand management tools? My guess is that they are equally defective.
Actually, I know they are. It all reminds me of a time back in the “previous century” when I had responsibility for the billing systems of another state water authority – when the then leadership recognised the need to upgrade and move toward a more flexible system.
This was planned to be a system that could accommodate fast and unusual change and which was responsive to government, customer and business needs. It has been in place elsewhere since the mid 1990’s.
One of my early tasks was to travel the country, meeting with leaders from other water authorities – with the objective being to see if we couldn’t all get together and contribute to a system that would deal with uniquely Australian issues and more importantly be one that would satisfy the needs of our owners (the state governments), the various state water businesses and our customers.
Now I could write a book about the various responses to that. But the response of the then E&WS Department was - why?
Basically, the locals didn’t *get* the need for change – they were happy with what they had and couldn’t ever see a need for “flexible” billing – because well “we don’t do that sort of thing here”.
I am sure they don’t.
Wednesday, July 9, 2008
Leaders have to Communicate
Yesterday I wrote about Ross Garnaut’s briefing at the Adelaide town hall – on the economic effects of climate change - and why this should be front page news in the Murdoch press today.
Well the local version of the Murdoch press is colloquially known as “The Daily Shopper” – its banner name is “The Advertiser”. I imagine you can guess what its prime focus is.
Anyway, the front page today is dedicated to that great intellectual pursuit - “Football” and a beatup about vehicle manufacturing. The Garnaut story is buried on page 8 – well hidden as a subset of a bigger story on the G8 meeting. Not only is it well disguised but it somehow doesn’t get around to mentioning the “risks” to South Australia that were a feature of the Garnaut briefing.
I suppose that if your primary business is selling advertising space to local retailers then the last thing you would want to do is “scare the horses”. But then I wonder who is responsible for informing the local community - if not the local newspaper?
This all reminds me of Lee Iacocca’s 9 commandments of leadership – one of which is:
“Leaders have to COMMUNICATE. I’m not talking about running off at the mouth or spouting sound bites. I’m talking about facing reality and telling the truth. Nobody seems to know how to talk straight anymore. Instead, they spend most of their time trying to convince us that things are not really as bad as they seem. I don’t know if it’s denial or dishonesty, but it can start to drive you crazy after a while. Communication has to start with telling the truth, even when it’s painful.”
Exactly.
Well the local version of the Murdoch press is colloquially known as “The Daily Shopper” – its banner name is “The Advertiser”. I imagine you can guess what its prime focus is.
Anyway, the front page today is dedicated to that great intellectual pursuit - “Football” and a beatup about vehicle manufacturing. The Garnaut story is buried on page 8 – well hidden as a subset of a bigger story on the G8 meeting. Not only is it well disguised but it somehow doesn’t get around to mentioning the “risks” to South Australia that were a feature of the Garnaut briefing.
I suppose that if your primary business is selling advertising space to local retailers then the last thing you would want to do is “scare the horses”. But then I wonder who is responsible for informing the local community - if not the local newspaper?
This all reminds me of Lee Iacocca’s 9 commandments of leadership – one of which is:
“Leaders have to COMMUNICATE. I’m not talking about running off at the mouth or spouting sound bites. I’m talking about facing reality and telling the truth. Nobody seems to know how to talk straight anymore. Instead, they spend most of their time trying to convince us that things are not really as bad as they seem. I don’t know if it’s denial or dishonesty, but it can start to drive you crazy after a while. Communication has to start with telling the truth, even when it’s painful.”
Exactly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
